См. также: extract from the commercial register, extorting, extra money, extrapolation
A default rule is one that governs unless the parties contract out of it. In contrast, a mandatory rule is one that governs despite a contract term to the contrary, that is, a rule that cannot be avoided by contract. One can identify which laws are default and which are mandatory by examining the sorts of contract terms that are, and are not, enforceable. For example, the legal rule that the place for delivery in a sale of goods is the seller's place of business is a default rule because parties can make an enforceable contract requiring delivery at some other location. In contrast, the legal rule giving a consumer the right that goods purchased not be "in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user" is mandatory because it applies no matter what the contract terms say. The distinction between mandatory and default rules is fundamentally important because it reveals the extent of contractual freedom. Mandatory rules limit the freedom of contract, while default rules permit it. (Arbitration Law in America: A Critical Assessment edited by Edward Brunet)
A default rule is one that governs unless the parties contract out of it. In contrast, a mandatory rule is one that governs despite a contract term to the contrary, that is, a rule that cannot be avoided by contract. One can identify which laws are default and which are mandatory by examining the sorts of contract terms that are, and are not, enforceable. For example, the legal rule that the place for delivery in a sale of goods is the seller's place of business is a default rule because parties can make an enforceable contract requiring delivery at some other location. In contrast, the legal rule giving a consumer the right that goods purchased not be "in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user" is mandatory because it applies no matter what the contract terms say. The distinction between mandatory and default rules is fundamentally important because it reveals the extent of contractual freedom. Mandatory rules limit the freedom of contract, while default rules permit it. (Arbitration Law in America: A Critical Assessment edited by Edward Brunet)
Among the typcal conditions that must be met before an employee can exercise the option that has been granted to him, it is frequently required that the employee continues to work for the employer during a certain period of time. To the extent that such a condition must be met before the option becomes exercisable, that condition has, in many countries, the legal nature of a condition precedent (common law) or suspensive condition (civil law). The option is not considered to have vestee before such a condition has been met. (Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital 2010 By OECD)
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to the extent that Indemnitee, by reason of Indemnitee's Corporate Status, is a witness, or receives a subpoena, in any Proceeding to which Indemnitee is not a party, Indemnitee shall be indemnified against all Expenses paid or incurred by Indemnitee in connection therewith and in the manner set forth in this Agreement. (lawinsider.com)
• extent
