Русско-англо-русский юридический словарь

DEFINITION of 'Escrow Agreement' A legal document that outlines the terms and conditions between parties involved in an escrow. An escrow agreement defines the arrangement by which one party deposits an asset with a third person (called an escrow agent), who will in turn make delivery to another party if and when the specified conditions of the contract have been met. (Investopedia)

In law, unjust enrichment is where one person is unjustly or by chance enriched at the expense of another, and an obligation to make restitution arises, regardless of liability for wrongdoing. A common example is when a party contracts to provide a service, but the contract is terminated prematurely due to a breach, and the contractor unjustly receives no compensation for partial services rendered.

The concept of unjust enrichment is based upon the Roman legal maxim "no one should be benefited at another's expense" (nemo locupletari potest aliena iactura or nemo locupletari debet cum alien iactura). (Wikipedia)

A default rule is one that governs unless the parties contract out of it. In contrast, a mandatory rule is one that governs despite a contract term to the contrary, that is, a rule that cannot be avoided by contract. One can identify which laws are default and which are mandatory by examining the sorts of contract terms that are, and are not, enforceable. For example, the legal rule that the place for delivery in a sale of goods is the seller's place of business is a default rule because parties can make an enforceable contract requiring delivery at some other location. In contrast, the legal rule giving a consumer the right that goods purchased not be "in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user" is mandatory because it applies no matter what the contract terms say. The distinction between mandatory and default rules is fundamentally important because it reveals the extent of contractual freedom. Mandatory rules limit the freedom of contract, while default rules permit it. (Arbitration Law in America: A Critical Assessment edited by Edward Brunet)

A default rule is one that governs unless the parties contract out of it. In contrast, a mandatory rule is one that governs despite a contract term to the contrary, that is, a rule that cannot be avoided by contract. One can identify which laws are default and which are mandatory by examining the sorts of contract terms that are, and are not, enforceable. For example, the legal rule that the place for delivery in a sale of goods is the seller's place of business is a default rule because parties can make an enforceable contract requiring delivery at some other location. In contrast, the legal rule giving a consumer the right that goods purchased not be "in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user" is mandatory because it applies no matter what the contract terms say. The distinction between mandatory and default rules is fundamentally important because it reveals the extent of contractual freedom. Mandatory rules limit the freedom of contract, while default rules permit it. (Arbitration Law in America: A Critical Assessment edited by Edward Brunet)